Catch Google’s Wave

I’m typically skeptical of new whiz-bang Web sites, tools, and features that set out to “change the way we work” until I’ve actually seen the benefit. Google Wave seeks to do just that. Rather than piling on one more piece of technology or layer of abstraction, they cleared the slate by asking, “How should all of this work?” rather than, “How could what exists be better?”

I’m intrigued because I’ve been having a lot of the same thoughts and discussions lately. Email has existed more or less the same way for well over a decade. People have built new interfaces, ways to tie conversation threads together, and new free services, but fundamentally the idea of sending messages with attachments back and forth in a time-shifted manner is the same.

googlewave4 Catch Googles Wave

Google Wave seeks to reinvent real-time interaction and collaboration by treating these interactions in a centralized, consistent manner. This makes sense to me. The more applications we layer on and rave about being “the new thing” (Twitter comes to mind), the more fragmented our communication becomes.

Google Wave may or may not be the answer, or it may just be a step in the right direction. At a glance it seems to be trying to solve something that’s been nagging me for awhile. We are so focused on the tools, we often lose sight of what we are trying to communicate and the value contained therein. At the end of the day, what matters is that we want to share ideas and messages with people who will find them relevant in the most efficient manner possible, no matter when or where they happen. If we’re developing a global hive mentality through our communication technology, it will depend on messages seamlessly interacting across mediums, languages, locations, and context. This is a lofty goal, but it’s one worth shooting for.

What’s Your Personal Message Space Worth?

I’m seeing more “free” offers come through friends feeds, such as on Twitter. I even participated in one, as an experiment. As always I encourage people to do whatever they want with Twitter, but we must consider the value of the collective attention spans we attract. The more people we reach see ads from you, the less they will value what you have to say. The number of ads you present is inversely proportional to the likelihood they will choose to continue hearing what you have to say.

We all now have the power to control what we hear and when we hear it, and that’s what’s new.

Now, the ads I’m seeing in particular on Twitter are for Macheist: I bought the @MacHeist 3 Bundle. 12 Top Mac apps worth $900+ for just $39 AND I just got Delicious Library 2 FREE! http://mhtweet.com/uQ1gyd

I happen to be someone who would be interested in this ad, as Macheist is a great program, but I’m torn. I know that many of the people who follow me wouldn’t be interested and would therefore just read it as a message I was passing on, however even less personal and constructive than a retweet. The social stream starts to feel more like a traditional ad campaign or SPAM in this context. Only now I have to weigh other factors such as personal trust. I know that the people I know will keep it to a minimum, and if they don’t, I (and others) will decide whether or not to keep listening.

In a world where the consumer gets to create and control his media, products and services must simply be good to survive. What’s interesting is that as more of my friends participate in promotions like the one above (three so far), the more compelled I feel to participate. This is for two reasons. One, I know that I won’t annoy them by sending it back, and in fact will reinforce their decisions to post. Two, some of this just boils down to basic peer pressure. If ten of my friends get something for free that I want, do I really want to be left out?

Having said that, I’m a huge believer in the power of word of mouth marketing, and this certainly falls into that category. It’s just a little more blatant than someone sharing that they enjoyed using a product. In this case, I’m not even sure my friends have used the product yet at all, which is why it feels less credible. I do appreciate the transparency of the message. It’s very clear where it came from, why it came to me, and what I could get out of it, which makes for a quicker assessment of value.

Into the Twittersphere

The point is well taken, if with a grain:

Twitter Your Way

I’ve seen a few good articles recently that can help you use Twitter the way you want to use it. That is, after all, the greatest thing about Twitter. The platform is so simple in design and execution that it can be used however you see fit. I rarely use the Twitter web site itself, opting instead for Twitterrific on the Mac and Twittelator Pro on the iPhone, so these first two articles give a great overview of other ways to access Twitter, from mobile devices to your desktop:

23 iPhone Apps

Top 20 Tools

This one is devoted to the craft of gaining a Twitter following:

Create a Following

And here’s a peak into how the C-suite is using Twitter:

Top CEO’s on Twitter

AT&T Begs for Bad Word of Mouth at Lollapalooza

Lollapalooza was generally a raging success this weekend. My favorite was Radiohead on Friday. They rarely disappoint.

Someone who did disappoint, however, was AT&T. It’s one thing to be caught off-guard by a city hosting an event that brings 75,000 people together on one day. It’s quite another when you are SPONSORING that event. Talk about bad marketing. It was difficult to get a call through, and I got a pile of text messages at the end of the evening from friends all throughout the day telling me where they were 6 hours ago. Great. Overall, AT&T has been okay, but I doubt I’d be with them were it not for the iPhone. To their credit, it did get a little better throughout the weekend, but not much.