Try Digg.com for URL Shortening

There has been a lot of discussion recently about URL shorteners, which have exploded in popularity due to the limited character count in Twitter (140 characters). Rather than wasting precious message space sharing a long URL, turn it into a small one that redirects people to the proper place.

TinyURL was the most prominent one initially, but many have sprung up, each offering various services and features. The allure is being able to track the specific URL that you created, which means that you can track your social influence by seeing who passes on your version of the particular link.

Bit.ly is one that does a good job of providing metrics and analysis to help you figure out where your link has travelled, but Digg.com is getting into the game. They have devised an elegant approach where you simply put a URL after “http://digg.com/” and it automatically turns it into a shortened URL, displays the site you linked, and a toolbar across the top with more options. Try it out:

http://digg.com/astekblog.com

URL shortening doesn’t come without implications for the structure of hyperlinks, which still rule the Web roost. Adding one more layer of interpretation has the potential to slow things down, cause more errors, or just complicate the system. Additionally, you should be aware that search engines place a substantial amount of weight on the keywords that you have in your URL, so if you are relying on inbound links (and who doesn’t?), it’s worth considering that search engines will not count these shortened URL’s in the same way as the permalinks you’ve worked so hard to optimize. For example, notice the category and title keywords in the URL for this blog:

http://www.astekblog.com/index.php/marketing/try-diggcom-for-url-shortening/

I see URL status moving in two directions, which should each be considered and used appropriately. 1) Permalinks (links that search engines see and won’t change like the one above) will continue to be essential in creating and classifying content on web sites. We will use search engines to reach these links. 2) In the social sharing world, shortened URL’s will gain more popularity as people start tracking their individual influence. It’s natural for Digg to get on this bandwagon since the entire point of Digg was to give people credit for “digging” URL’s, sharing them and gaining notoriety for finding cool things. Perhaps one or the other will win out. If it’s the latter, then sites will need to start building this social tracking capability directly into the permalinks themselves, which must be short enough to share.

It’s not going to take long for monetization to enter this game, where people receive more than social currency for initiating a link chain. One’s social network will become an even more valuable tool as advertisers begin to see the value of tracking recommendations amongst individual people. These recommendations will be more directly attributed to sales, which gives companies incentives to offer cash compensation or commissions to people who did the referring.

Keywords and Categories and Tags, Oh My

With billions of web pages out there, the web would be utterly useless without search engines and tools that help us label and categorize content to make it easier to find. This taxonomy breaks down into “meta data,” which is extra information that you attach to a piece of content to help describe it, and the content itself. A good example is a digital photograph. It’s likely that you usually only look at the photo itself, but your camera automatically attaches meta information such as date/time and perhaps location. New face recognition software makes it even easier to find that particular photo you’re looking for in your library of thousands.

What do categories, tags, and keywords all have in common? These are all tools we use to organize and classify information in order to make it easier for people to find when they need it. I’ll describe each below using this blog post as the consistent example to illustrate the differences.

I’m going to start with categories since they are the most intuitive. Categories are used to define general topics of interest related to a subject. You can see the Astek Blog categories listed to the right of this post. Categories serve two very useful functions when applied to blogs. 1) It helps the readers know at a quick glance the general topics being covered by the blog. 2) It helps the author(s) stay focused. Blogs are best when they are focused around a certain set of topics and this is an easy check to make sure the blog post is still on track. It is common to see something generic like “General” as the only category. While this can be applicable in some cases, it’s typically not an effective way to label your posts.

picture 610 Keywords and Categories and Tags, Oh My

Categories are common in blogging software. You can typically define the categories you want to write about, and each time you write a post simply select the categories that apply to that post. If you find yourself commonly wanting to write about a category that isn’t in your list, go ahead and add it. Just remember to keep your list relatively short (fewer than ten) to make it easy on the reader. In this case, I used the following categories for this post:

Categories: ePiphany Featured Story, Marketing, Social Media, Technology, Web

As it becomes easier and easier for anyone to create and distribute content of all types on the Internet, categories quickly start to become a fairly limited way to organize information. Enter tags, which have become popular in the past few years. While I recommend putting a limit on the number of categories you use, there is no practical limit the number of tags you can attach to your content. Any significant concept word that is related to your text is worth putting in as a tag.

Tags are single-word labels that you can add to as you go. A tag “word” might actually contain more than one word, but it’s important that the tag have no spaces for consistency. Whereas I felt limited to five related categories for this post, I assigned ALL of the following tags to describe the article I’m writing:

Tags: apple, astek, blog, bookmarking, categories, community, content, design, distribution, how-to, information, internet, keywords, Marketing, media, publishing, search, seo, sharing, social, socialmedia, tags, Technology, tip, tool, Web, web2.0, writing

To get an idea of all the specific areas we cover in the Astek Blog, check out our tag cloud:

picture 89 Keywords and Categories and Tags, Oh My

Okay, that looks cool, but what does it mean? Notice how some of the words in the tag cloud are larger and bolder than others? Technology, Web, socialmedia, Entrepreneurship, etc. The more a single tag is used to describe each post on this blog, the larger and bolder that tag will become in the tag cloud. This makes it easy to see at a glance which topics are covered more than others, which gives readers a more detailed topical view of the blog content. Click on a tag to see all the posts related to that word or concept.

Tags emerged from social media. Delicious.com and Flickr.com were at the forefront of developing this technology a few years ago. Since then, tags have become the commonplace method of assigning labels to vast amounts of information to make it easy to find later. I recommend you sign up for a free account at Delicious.com to store all your web bookmarks in one location (great for accessing from various locations). There is also no better way to demonstrate how tags depend on the community to make sure people are using them consistently. When you bookmark a site in Delicious.com, the community suggests several tags that other people have used to describe that web site. Typically the community gets it right, which means you have to think less about what tags to use. It makes everything quicker and more reliable.

In the following example, I tried to bookmark Apple’s web site in Delicious. Since I had already bookmarked it, Delicious shows me all the tags I had already used (highlighted in gray boxes). However, since that was awhile ago, the community has applied many new tags to describe the site. All I have to do is click on the new tags I want to assign to the bookmark.

picture 129 Keywords and Categories and Tags, Oh My

Then, when I want to find a particular web site, I can use tags to filter my bookmarks. In order to find Apple on my Delicious.com account, I might type the following tags:

Tags: computer hardware ipod

In that example Apple is the only site that has all three of those tags attached to it. If I remove the “ipod” tag, I get six results (including Apple) that are related to “computer hardware.” Go ahead and try it yourself.

picture 139 Keywords and Categories and Tags, Oh My

In the blogosphere, prominent blog search engines like Technorati and blog authoring tools like WordPress collect tags from all the people who use these services. When you write a post on WordPress, it suggests tags that others have used based on the content you are writing. The more people consistently use tags to describe content, the easier it becomes to discover content that relates to other web sites. We’re moving away from meticulously crafting the taxonomy, and instead tossing it all in the bag. The trick is if we put a tag on everything on the way in, we’ll know where to grab it on the way out.

Last, but certainly not least, we have keywords. I’m going to save an in-depth discussion of search engines for another ePiphany, but keywords are used most heavily when using sites like Google, Yahoo, Alta Vista, etc. to find specific content on the web. Search engine optimization (SEO) is also called search engine marketing.

If you’ve stuck with me so far, you might be asking yourself what the difference between a keyword and a tag is. The key difference between the two is that tags are attached to content and keywords are IN the content itself. It’s a special combination of art and science to properly optimize a page on a web site. First we find the keywords that people are using to find that type of content, which is not always intuitive and requires research. Then we integrate these keywords directly into your content through strategic copy writing to allow search engines to find them contextually. The trick here is preserving the integrity of the authored material while making it searchable.

Gone are the days of loading up meta keywords behind the scenes and being done with it. A good SEO strategy requires consistent monitoring and tweaking.

A Few Things To Keep In Mind:

Pluralization and alternate forms are always a bit weird with tags. I usually just put both forms in. You never know if someone will search for “finance” or “financial” or “finances.”

Spelling is something common to all of these. A misspelled tag or keyword will result in the content potentially not coming up. Some people optimize for misspellings to grab some low hanging fruit (e.g., micorsoft).

There is common confusion about the “rules” of tagging. Particularly when you get into the semantics of multi-word phrases like “social media.” My advice is to use any variation of the tag you think is appropriate. In that case I would use “socialmedia,” “social,” and “media” as separate tags.

Feel free to post questions in the comments.

astekarrow10 Keywords and Categories and Tags, Oh My This post was featured in ePiphany, Astek’s Monthly Newsletter |  Other ePiphany Articles 

astekarrow11 Keywords and Categories and Tags, Oh My Haven’t experienced an ePiphany yet?  Sign up! 

R.I.P. Magnolia

One of the predominant social bookmarking web sites, Magnolia, just experienced a catastrophic loss of data. I’ve focused recently on protecting desktop environments from data loss, but it’s important to realize that web sites aren’t magically immune to data loss. Web server technology is fundamentally based on the same principles as your desktop computer.

I wish them and all their users all the best for a full recovery. This kind of incident is unfortunate and probably could have been prevented. Even if they get the data back, I think it will difficult to re-establish the credibility needed for this type of application. People invest a lot of time researching, surfing, and bookmarking sites on the Internet. I know I would be fairly devastated to lose my own bread crumb trail, which I keep in Delicious.

iPhone Music Syncing With Multiple Machines

So I’ve had this minor issue with my iPhone for the past year and a half. I have never been able to sync music from my music server and everything else (photos, contacts, calendars, applications, etc.) from my laptop. I use a separate music server, partially for storage capacity and backup, partially to have my entire library on a fixed server for streaming music throughout my home and syncing to all portable (iPod/iPhone) devices. This is a minor issue because I have plenty of access to my music on iPods and throughout my office and home. Generally I prefer not to consume my iPhone’s valuable battery with music playing, but I don’t use most of the storage space so I’d like to have some music on there just in case.

Apple baked the functionality for this into iTunes pretty near the launch of the original iPhone. My problem seemed to be that I had synced music from my laptop, then unchecked the box to remove the music in hopes I could mate this function to the music server. Every time I’d tried to do it in the past, I was faced with this message:

sync warning as5 iPhone Music Syncing With Multiple Machines

The main reason that I was timid about a reset was the large number of Notes on the iPhone that I didn’t want to risk losing. Apple STILL doesn’t sync notes (or tasks for that matter), which is really odd since they now have notes and tasks as parts of Mail in Leopard. Luckily, with solutions like Evernote and Mark/Space Missing Sync for iPhone and Notebook there are easy work-arounds. I’ve used the latter for iPhone note syncing for months and am gradually switching over to the web-based note system that is Evernote.

Since I finally got around to getting an iPhone 3G (was holding out for something new at MacWorld and I’ve recently discovered the bluetooth on my iPhone is not working correctly–I’d always blamed my Prius–sorry Lola), I thought this would be a good time to give it another shot.

After some futzing and re-syncing I was getting the same warning message. Since everything seemed to sync to the new phone (even notes, though applications were in a different order on the phone), I decided just to try the Erase and Sync on the music server as I’d been advised that the music server should be synced first. Rather than erasing the phone, it synced only the music to the iPhone, leaving everything else alone.

So the message was a false alarm and taking the leap of faith paid off. Your mileage may vary and I’m still not exactly sure whey I was caught in this weird music syncing limbo to begin with, but now everything seems fine.

Bottom line, if you are getting this message even after you’ve un-syncing music to the iPhone from your main computer, it MAY work to just go ahead and Erase and Sync. There are so many variables here, though, that you may also end up erasing all the other info on your iPhone. In this case, just sync the music computer first, then check everything OTHER than music on the main computer and it should work fine.

If you are trying to sync music from two different computers to one iPhone (e.g., laptop and music server), you should check out this guide from Andrew Grant at Shiny Things. It involves some light hacking, which I don’t think would be difficult for most users. It’s not necessary for me, so I’ll skip it. The greatest worry here is that some future version of iTunes will make the hack stop working or worse yet corrupt some settings you changed.

LinkedIn Profile Optimization

Like most new web sites with potential, I signed up for LinkedIn years ago when it came out. The problem with a networking site is that if no one is on it yet, it can’t do you much good. So I set it aside for the most part, lazily connecting to people as they popped up here and there until one day a critical mass would exist.

Recently I decided to give it another shot. I feel that social networking, particularly on Facebook, has reached a saturation of participants who are neither geeks nor young. This is important because it’s only when the tool steps off the stage of attention that anyone not interested in the tool itself will begin to find it useful.

So it goes for LinkedIn. I updated and optimized my profile, then uploaded my most recent address book to the site and found 200 people I knew personally or professionally who I hadn’t yet connected to. That was a bit less than half of the people I uploaded, 45 of whom I was already friends with.

For better or worse I did this over Thanksgiving weekend, and within a couple of days tripled my number of connections, exponentially increasing the 2nd and 3rd degree connections. As with Facebook, it’s been a nice opportunity to casually reconnect with people I did a limited amount of business with at one time or another. This is why burning bridges is not such a good thing. Luckily I figured that one out awhile ago.

One of the most powerful marketing devices in any market is testimonials, so I’ve been collecting recommendations from my richest client relationships. Not only is a bit of a confidence boost to read these and post them to my profile, it makes me take just a little more pride in my work. I’ve earned them, true, but I must continue to earn them if they will continue to speak for me.

LinkedIn was innovative in bringing a social networking brand to the business world, but I don’t see it as being on par in terms of overall innovation to Facebook. At least when concepts and features are borrowed, people will already know how to use them.

What’s missing? I’d really like to see some sort of conversation area where I could talk more about job opportunities, contracted work, etc. It seems that recommendations are key to getting a web gig from one of the million+ people in my network. Not that it should be easy, but getting on someone’s recommended short list should be simple through this tool, and that’s the main goal. It always takes more conversation to evaluate the match.

The status update is a start, but it’s a token gesture toward a social networking trend. To make it useful in the professional world, I would want to talk about a few things I’m working on, particularly projects that people might find interesting or that would even lead to business leads.

Mac zoom trick

So we’ve had zooming for awhile, but it’s always required some funky key combination. This may have been in the system for awhile, but I just discovered it and thought it was useful enough to share.

Try this: Hold control and move the scroll wheel on your mouse. A nice, easy way to see hard-to-read stuff.

« Previous Page