Artificial Intelligence vs. The Typewriter
I’ve spent most of my life evaluating the impact of new technology and pondering how it can make life better, work more efficient and people more knowledgeable.
I’ve found that often people seem to get very frustrated when technology changes. Facebook is a famous example of this, as they change their interface regularly. I recently noticed that since switching to Timeline that Facebook had defaulted to showing all my photos and friends to all 800 million Facebook users. The interface to set Facebook privacy is poorly designed and de-centralized, so for the first time I find myself joining the bandwagon of discontented users.
But I’ve noticed it coming up in other discussions recently, such as learning to type on the iPhone and getting used to threaded or “smart” email systems. People often use the word, “intuitive” to describe technology interfaces when they really mean “familiar.”
iPhone typing, or touchscreen typing in general, presented a steep learning curve for people used to good ole fashioned keyboards. Keyboards evolved from typewriters, which were straightforward mechanical interfaces. You press a key and the letter is presented on your page.
We have entered an age where technological innovation seeks to make up for the clumsiness of human fingers on small devices by responding with suggestions when it thinks it can help. Apple calls this feature Auto Correct. I believe this is fundamentally a good thing, but it does require some adjustment as people are now interfacing with artificial intelligence rather than a passive mechanical interface. Truly embracing and adapting to this concept will render good results while expecting an iPhone to work like a typewriter will result in frustration.
Threaded email is another innovation along the same lines. Email systems that display email messages simply ordered by date or author have quickly been replaced by the concept of threaded conversations. Email is fundamentally a very outdated technology that won’t change due to all the disparate systems that must talk to each other. So the artificial intelligence of threading is introduced on the system that people use to read messages, such as Gmail or Apple Mail in Lion. For the most part, I think threading is a huge time-saver, but it’s required me to rethink how I interact with my email, especially when searching for specific messages.
Microsoft’s “Ribbon GUI” interface, introduced in Windows Office 2007 was a bold gesture. They performed a significant amount of user testing to evaluate the increased efficiency of reinventing the classic word processor/spreadsheet interfaces that people had used for decades. Those seeking familiarity were met with great frustration. Those who took the time to retrain themselves to adapt to the benefits of the interface arguably were rewarded with enhanced productivity.
The point is that we must open our minds to some degree of retraining, rather than assuming each piece of technology will simply build upon our familiarity with what we used before. The very nature of technological progress dictates that we must constantly be willing to challenge existing paradigms to break free of the familiar and find something truly better. It might just take a bit of effort for us all, but it’s often worth it.
Then again, sometimes technological upgrades really are not better on any level. We’ve all experienced this enough over the years to be somewhat gun-shy about embracing the latest and greatest. The increased ability for consumers to express opinions via social media about things that don’t work well has caused many companies quickly to roll back new features and try again. This direct and immediate feedback leads to better interface design in the long run when the companies listen.
They say it takes three weeks to form a new habit, so be sure to give new interfaces at least that much time before giving up. Give it a shot, or ask your friendly technology philosopher to show you the way.






















